TL; DR: Vibe Coding
Vibe coding — using natural language to generate code through AI — represents a significant evolution in software development. It accelerates feedback cycles and democratizes programming but raises concerns about maintainability, security, and technical debt.
Learn why success likely requires a balanced approach: using vibe coding for rapid prototyping while maintaining rigorous standards for production code, with developers evolving from writers to architects and reviewers or auditors.
🇩🇪 Zur deutschsprachigen Version des Artikels: Vibe Coding: Ist das agil oder nur eine Modeerscheinung?.
🗞 Shall I notify you about articles like this one? Awesome! You can sign up here for the ‘Food for Agile Thought’ newsletter and join 42,000-plus subscribers.
🛑 Becoming obsolete is a choice, not inevitable!
👉 Don’t Miss Out — Join the Second Cohort: AI for Agile Practitioners: Pilot Cohort #2, May 14 to June 11, 2025, at € 199!
Definition and Origins of Vibe Coding
In a way, vibe coding represents a fundamental shift in creating software. Rather than typing out syntax-perfect code, developers using the vibe coding approach express their intent in natural language, letting AI tools handle the translation into functional code. This approach emerged from the rapidly evolving capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and coding assistants.
The term gained significant traction following Andrej Karpathy’s observations about the changing nature of programming, capturing the paradigm shift as developers began leveraging AI to convert natural language descriptions into executable code.
As these AI coding assistants matured, Karpathy’s insight evolved further to the point where he noted that with modern AI tools, “it’s not really coding – I just see stuff, say stuff, run stuff, and copy paste stuff, and it mostly works.” This statement encapsulates the essence of vibe coding: describing what you want the software to do and trusting AI to implement it correctly, often with minimal human intervention in the actual code generation process.
Cannot see the form? Please click here.
Agile/Product Management Perspective
Vibe Coding and Alignment with Agile Principles
From an Agile perspective, vibe coding presents intriguing possibilities. The core Agile principle of “responding to change over following a plan” perfectly aligns with vibe coding’s flexibility. When product requirements shift, describing the new functionality in natural language and having AI quickly generate updated code could theoretically accelerate the adaptation process.
Vibe coding also resonates with the “inspect and adapt” cycle central to Scrum and other Agile frameworks. Teams can quickly generate code, inspect the results, learn from feedback, and iterate rapidly—potentially compressing what might have been days of conventional development into hours.
Accelerating the Build-Measure-Learn Cycle
Vibe coding could turbocharge the “build, measure, learn” cycle for product managers and entrepreneurs practicing Lean. Creating functional prototypes to test with users no longer requires coding knowledge or a significant investment. A product manager could describe a feature in natural language, have AI generate a working prototype, and put it in front of users within the same day.
This acceleration of the feedback loop represents perhaps the strongest argument for vibe coding’s Agile credentials. When gathering user feedback is the primary goal, functional demonstrations that produce meaningful responses become more valuable.
Moving Fast Without Breaking (Too Many) Things
Vibe coding could enable teams to move at remarkable speeds, but questions remain about reliability. While AI-generated code often “mostly works,” that qualifier becomes problematic in production environments where “mostly” isn’t good enough. However, the speed advantages may outweigh the quality concerns for early-stage validation and prototyping.
Innovative product teams might adopt a hybrid approach: using vibe coding for rapid prototyping and initial validation, then refactoring critical components with traditional coding practices once the direction is validated. This balanced approach could capture speed benefits while mitigating risks.
Technical Perspective
Quality and Maintainability Concerns
Professional developers raise legitimate concerns about code quality with vibe coding approaches. AI-generated code, while functional, often lacks the thoughtful architecture and dedication to technical excellence that experienced developers bring to projects.
As Toby Devonshire warns: “Vibe coding is all fun and games until you have to vibe debug.” The concern is valid: prototypes may morph into production systems riddled with technical debt without disciplined testing and documentation.
This effect can result in inadequate implementations, unnecessary dependencies, or brittle code that works for the specific use case but breaks when conditions change. For example, Jo Bergum reports: “My experience with vibe coding is that it’s fantastic for MVP but more frustrating for rewrites in larger code bases. When Claude starts to fake implementations to make tests pass, or solve dependency issues by implementing a mock, it feels like there is still a few more months“.
Therefore, perhaps, maintainability presents the greatest technical challenge. When developers need to modify AI-generated code months later, they may struggle to understand the implementation choices. Without clear documentation explaining why certain approaches were taken, maintenance becomes significantly more difficult.
Security Vulnerabilities
Security represents another major concern. AI coding assistants primarily optimize for functionality rather than security, potentially introducing vulnerabilities that human developers would quickly identify. While some AI tools incorporate security checks, they rarely match the comprehensive risk analysis that security-focused developers perform.
These concerns become especially relevant for applications handling sensitive data or financial transactions. Vibe coding might be inappropriate for these use cases without extensive human review and enhancement.
Technical Debt Acceleration
Perhaps most concerning from a technical perspective is the potential for vibe coding to accelerate technical debt accumulation. Traditional development approaches often involve careful consideration of architecture to minimize future rework. Vibe coding, emphasizing immediate functionality over long-term sustainability, could create significant future costs.
The process resembles taking out a high-interest loan against your codebase’s future. The immediate productivity gains feel valuable, but eventually, the technical debt payments come due in the form of maintenance challenges, refactoring needs, and scaling difficulties.
Entrepreneurial and Economic Perspective
Democratizing Software Creation
One of vibe coding’s most promising aspects is its potential to democratize software creation. Entrepreneurs with valuable domain knowledge but limited technical skills can now transform their ideas into working software without first learning to code or hiring expensive development teams.
This accessibility could unleash innovation from previously excluded groups. Domain experts, for example, in healthcare, education, agriculture, and countless other fields, might create specialized tools that address needs that traditional software companies have overlooked.
Lowering Barriers to Entry
The economic implications of lowering barriers to entry in software creation are significant. Startups could launch with smaller initial investments, extending their runway and increasing their chances of finding product-market fit before funds run out. This advantage could lead to more diverse experimentation in the software ecosystem.
For established companies, vibe coding might enable innovation from departments traditionally separate from software development. Marketing teams could prototype customer-facing tools, operations staff could build process automation, and sales representatives could create custom demos without depending on a development team’s bandwidth. (Please note that this perspective might introduce problems at a different level, from strategic alignment to selling not features but products that do not yet exist.)
Vibe Coding and Developer Job Security
Some critics argue that resistance to vibe coding stems partially from developers’ concerns about job security. If non-technical team members can create functional software independently, what does this mean for professional developers?
This perspective oversimplifies the situation. While vibe coding might reduce demand for basic implementation work, it likely increases the value of developers who can architect complex systems, optimize performance, ensure security, and maintain large codebases over time. The role may evolve, but professional development expertise remains essential.
Balanced View and Possible Future
Finding the Appropriate Applications for Vibe Coding
A balanced assessment suggests vibe coding has legitimate applications within an Agile context, particularly for:
- Rapid prototyping and concept validation,
- Internal tools with limited security requirements,
- Projects where the speed of iteration outweighs long-term maintainability,
- Environments where technical resources are limited.
Conversely, vibe coding appears less suitable for:
- Systems with stringent security requirements,
- Applications requiring optimal performance,
- Long-lived products expecting significant evolution,
- Projects with regulatory compliance requirements.
Mitigation Strategies
Therefore, it seems beneficial that teams integrating vibe coding with Agile workflows adopt hybrid approaches:
- Phased Integration: Start with non-critical tasks like utility functions, then expand to feature development,
- AI-Augmented Reviews: Tools like Snyk now offer workshops to audit AI-generated code for vulnerabilities,
- Guardrails: Enforcing coding standards via prompts (e.g., “Refactor for readability”) reduces technical debt.
The Evolving Role of Professional Developers
As vibe coding capabilities mature, the role of professional developers will likely transform rather than diminish. Developers may shift from writing every line of code to:
- Defining and maintaining architectural standards,
- Auditing and refining AI-generated code,
- Creating guardrails and frameworks within which AI can safely operate,
- Focusing on complex problems that remain challenging for AI.
This evolution mirrors historical patterns in software development. Just as high-level languages and frameworks abstracted away machine code and memory management, vibe coding may abstract away routine implementation details, allowing developers to focus on higher-level concerns.
Vibe Coding’s Integration with Agile Practices
Forward-thinking Agile teams might integrate vibe coding into existing workflows rather than replacing traditional development entirely. For example:
- Using vibe coding during initial sprints focused on concept validation,
- Letting Product Owners or designers create initial implementations for refinement by developers,
- Employing AI pair programming where developers guide AI code generation with human expertise.
This integration acknowledges both vibe coding’s strengths and limitations, using each approach where it delivers the most value.
Conclusion
Vibe coding represents neither a complete revolution nor a mere fad but rather an evolution in how software gets created. It aligns with Agile’s emphasis on rapid iteration and user feedback while challenging traditional code quality and maintainability notions.
Organizations willing to thoughtfully integrate vibe coding into their development workflows—recognizing where it adds value and where traditional approaches remain superior—stand to gain significant advantages in speed and accessibility. Those who dismiss it entirely risk missing opportunities for innovation, while those who uncritically embrace vibe coding may create unsustainable technical debt.
As with most technological advances, the most successful approach involves pragmatic adoption guided by clear principles rather than wholesale acceptance or rejection. Vibe coding is unlikely to replace traditional development, but it has already begun to transform it in ways that will reshape software creation irreversibly.
What are you using Vibe Coding for? Please share with us in the comments.
Recommended Reading for Vibe Coding
The Agile Prompt Engineering Framework
AI in Agile Product Teams: Insights from Deep Research and What It Means for Your Practice
60 ChatGPT Prompts Plus Prompt Engineering Guide for Scrum Practitioners
👆 Stefan Wolpers: The Scrum Anti-Patterns Guide (Amazon advertisement.)
🛑 Becoming obsolete is a choice, not inevitable!
👉 Don’t Miss Out — Join the Second Cohort: AI for Agile Practitioners: Pilot Cohort #2, May 14 to June 11, 2025, at € 199!
📅 Scrum Training Classes, Workshops, and Events
Learn more about the Lean Tech Manifesto with our Scrum training classes, workshops, and events. You can secure your seat directly by following the corresponding link in the table below:
See all upcoming classes here.
You can book your seat for the training directly by following the corresponding links to the ticket shop. If the procurement process of your organization requires a different purchasing process, please contact Berlin Product People GmbH directly.
✋ Do Not Miss Out and Learn more about Vibe Coding — Join the 20,000-plus Strong ‘Hands-on Agile’ Slack Community
I invite you to join the “Hands-on Agile” Slack Community and enjoy the benefits of a fast-growing, vibrant community of agile practitioners from around the world.
If you would like to join all you have to do now is provide your credentials via this Google form, and I will sign you up. By the way, it’s free.
Prepare yourself for Agile and AI videos by studying the free Scrum Anti-Patterns Guide:
The post Is Vibe Coding Agile or Merely a Hype? appeared first on Age-of-Product.com.
